In the news recently was the possibility of the
California public university system adding to their demographics
collection for applicants questions about their sexual orientation. I
have mixed feelings about this depending on the question. For
example, one of the news reports mentions a private school in
Illinois that has “3%
reporting to be homosexual, bisexual or transgender.” One thing
that I have never understood is why 'transgender' is on a list of
sexual orientations. It's not a sexual orientation, it's a gender
history. A person can be a homosexual trans woman, or a bisexual
trans man, or even something not even mentioned like a pansexual
trans gender queer.
This
gets into part of the problem I can see happening. According to the
same news source the new law that asks universities to allow students
and staff to be able to “identify their sexual orientation, gender
identity and gender expression” This would be really cool and
validating if it was done right but from what I can tell so far the
question is mainly going to be about sexual orientation, and the only
orientations I have seen listed yet are heterosexual, homosexual,
bisexual and questioning. This is really invalidating to the students
who don't identify with this limited list of orientations. If it was
a fill in the blank, or even had the option of 'other' it would be a
little better. Even though 'other' is still rendering a person into
that status and is dehumanizing at least then their voices could
possibly be heard but as is it isn't looking likely.
Another
disheartening part of the stories is the discussion of the UC
Undergrad Experience Survey which listed gay/lesbian or
self-identified queer together and bisexual and questioning as
separate categories. My first response was 'wait what?' This is
completely ridiculous and tells me that whoever designed the survey
questions has no idea what the different orientations are.
Elmhurst
College was also reported but they seemed to do things a little
better by asking “would you consider yourself to be a member of the
LGBT community?” See, while that isn't perfect it is at least a bit
better. There they are asking what they want to know – are you part
of the community we are interested in serving. It feels like they
aren't doing lip service to wanting to actually know about the sexual
orientations of the people on campus but actually asking the question
of if you would use the services provided for LGBT people. This
doesn't have as much pretense as questions on your actual
orientation.
More
services for QUILTBAG students is great and a worthy goal so I am
glad that the uni's are trying to do something to help ensure that
these students are getting the services they need but it needs to be
done right. At the moment, I have little faith that the schools will
be putting questions on their admittance forms that validate
non-binary students, especially given that most still have 'sex:
male/female' on there. Maybe this is a step in the right direction
but it seems to me like another way to keep rendering those who
aren't binary in gender and orientation, or those who aren't sexual,
invisible.
All
of the quotes in this are from LA Times, the article can be found
here.
No comments:
Post a Comment