Gender is confusing. When I first started
questioning my gender this is something that I said regularly and
frankly, that hasn't changed much in the last year or so. Growing up
it's always boy or girl, no in between, this idea is reinforced in
school until as adults we are so used to a binary that is difficult
for most people to change. Unless you are one of those kids who never
really felt like they sat right in their gender. That little kid who
did all of the 'boy things' and who didn't like the 'girl stuff' and
didn't get why other kids wanted to do silly things rather than run
around outside and climb trees. Thankfully University came along and
I got one more opportunity to question again. Now here I am
supposedly an adult and I get to do all of the gender exploration
that I never got to do as a child.
My reading and researching has led me to divide
gender into five categories; gender identity, gender expression,
gender attribution, gender identity fluidity and gender expression
fluidity. These five categories tell us what gender a person is, how
often that changes as well as how that is presented to the world. As
with Sex, these aren't necessarily stable quantities - a persons
identity can change over time and their expression surely does. From
what I have seen in my reading so far this is especially true for
afab people because society is more accepting of their gender
exploration than people who are amab. Now for a little more detail on
each of the categories, what research needs to be done on the
different hypothesis involved and then what can be done with the
information.
Gender identity is one of the characteristics
that people are likely most familiar with because this is where trans
gender people become known. The category is a little more complicated
that just cis vs trans though because we have two classifications to
start with, binary and non-binary then we break those down even
further. On the binary side we have cis male and cis female as well
as trans male and trans female. On the non-binary side things are
more complicated. We have neutrois, gender fluid, gender queer,
gender neutral, agender, and I am sure there are more that I don't
know of yet. Each of these non-binary classifications can have a
trans history as well, though that is up to the person to identify.
Gender expression gets even more complicated
with gender fucks and gender queers intentionally playing with
peoples attributions. There are what are considered 'masculine' and
'feminine' expressions and dyke, boi, femme, androgynous, and all of
the different combinations and classifications that can appear. For
the sake of my brain I have just those I have listed here as well as
an 'other' category but that may change as the research finds what
people feel their expression best falls into.
Gender attribution is what other people think
is your gender identity (and often your asab) just from your gender
expression. This is most commonly male, female or trans but depending
on the person doing the attribution the range of options can be just
as broad as the range of potential identities. As with any
attribution, those who are active in the gender world likely will ask
a persons gender identity and their pronouns before this attribution
is fully made.
Gender identity and expression fluidity can
both very drastically for people, especially gender expression. The
difference here though is if people attribute you to be a female then
more fluidity in gender expression is accepted vs the tighter levels
of acceptable gender expression exploration that society finds
acceptable in males. The variation can be from essentially stable or
small amounts of fluidity to semi-regular, or moderate fluidity and
finally to high fluidity where your identity or expression changes
quite a bit. These are two different categories but both have a big
impact on a person both in how others perceive them to if they get
cis privilege or not.
There have been a number of studies already
into gender identity but, as is common in many programmes, non-binary
identities have largely been ignored. I would like to try to
replicate some of the research that has been done on gender identity
while taking into account that there are non-binary people out there.
I would also like to see about modifying some of the existing
questionnaires to be more inclusive of non-binary people and to be
able to accurately measure the gender identity of a person, rather
than just leaving things in the binary.
For gender expression the best way to get this
information would be a survey of people with a variety of different
gender identities asking them what kinds of expression they do to
show the world their gender. This can range from clothing and jewelry
to body language and even methods of speaking. Clinical interviews
would also be useful for this because then more information can be
gathered on points that need clarification.
For gender attribution, the best way to do this
would be to have a variety of people from a variety of backgrounds
look at people of a variety of gender identities and expressions and
have them label each with what they think the persons gender identity
is. This would not only give the different kinds of labels people
give but the frequency of the labels as per different identities and
expressions.
Gender identity fluidity and gender expression
fluidity can both be done in similar ways to the body map fluidity
research I outlined last post. This would be a preliminary
retrospective survey on the persons gender identity and expression
and how the changes over time and a follow up longitudinal study
having people journal their identity and expression over time. This
combination would give both how people perceive themselves changing
over time as well as the reality of what is occurring.
The practical aspect of this is that it can
help a person who is struggling with their identity to clearly see
what is going on, or for their therapist to get a better idea of what
they are presenting. Especially if measures can be made or adapted to
be used to determine this information. Examples of the use of this is
to help people who are trans and want to either have surgery or go on
hormones. A clinical interview to get the needed information on sex
and gender in this system would tell someone that the person is trans
and if they want to do hormones or surgery it can inform the process
from there while validating the persons gender. The current system is
invalidating for people with non-binary genders and even may binary
trans people find the system to be deeply problematic. While this
wouldn't entirely renovate the system a therapist using this base to
evaluate the persons need for alignment processes while removing the
invalidation of either the therapist denying your gender identity or
having to lie about it, thus rendering your actual identity
invisible.
No comments:
Post a Comment